Back tostdlib
blog post
New

Glue teams vs. back-office teams

An article that explains the distinction between glue teams and back-office teams and why getting this right is critical for engineering leadership.

Overview
This newsletter post discusses the concept of glue teams versus back-office teams within technology organizations. It clarifies how glue teams serve as cross-functional connectors that enable rapid collaboration, while back-office teams focus on maintaining core infrastructure and processes. Understanding the correct role for each type helps leaders allocate resources effectively and avoid costly misalignments.

Key Takeaways

  • Glue teams accelerate delivery by breaking down silos and facilitating communication across product groups.
  • Back-office teams provide stability, reliability, and compliance for foundational systems.
  • Misclassifying a team can lead to scope creep, burnout, or reduced velocity.
  • Leaders should assess team goals, metrics, and dependencies before deciding on a glue or back-office model.
  • Clear charter and success criteria are essential for both types of teams.

Who Would Benefit

  • Engineering managers responsible for structuring their orgs.
  • CTOs and VP of Engineering planning scaling strategies.
  • Product leaders who need to coordinate across multiple squads.
  • Technical leads evaluating team charters and KPIs.

Frameworks and Methodologies

  • Team Topologies (stream-aligned, enabling, platform, and complicated-subsystem teams).
  • Agile delivery practices for cross-functional collaboration.
  • DevOps principles for back-office reliability.
Source: newsletter.posthog.com
#leadership#engineering management#team structure#glue teams#back-office teams#technical leadership#product development

Explore more resources

Check out the full stdlib collection for more frameworks, templates, and guides to accelerate your technical leadership journey.