Back tostdlib
blog post
New

Common misconceptions of Trunk-based development

When you search Google for trunk-based development, you often see a provocative headline that suggests it is a "complete crock of shit". This post clears up common misconceptions about trunk-based development and explains why it matters for modern software teams.

Overview
This article debunks the most frequent myths surrounding trunk-based development (TBD), a branching strategy that encourages all developers to commit to a single shared branch. It explains why TBD is not a chaotic or risky approach, and how it supports continuous integration, fast feedback, and high-quality releases.

Key Takeaways

  • TBD does not mean developers must commit directly to production; short-lived feature flags and automated testing keep releases safe.
  • Misconception that TBD requires a monolithic codebase is false; it works well with micro-services and modular architectures.
  • Proper CI pipelines, automated testing, and feature toggles are essential to make TBD successful.
  • Teams that adopt TBD often see faster cycle times, reduced merge conflicts, and smoother deployments.

Who Would Benefit

  • Engineering managers looking to improve release velocity.
  • Technical leaders wanting to adopt continuous integration practices.
  • Developers transitioning from long-lived feature branches.
  • Teams evaluating DevOps transformations.

Frameworks and Methodologies

  • Continuous Integration (CI)
  • Feature Flags / Toggle Management
  • DevOps
  • Agile Development
Source: reflag.com
#trunk-based development#continuous integration#devops#software engineering#technical leadership#agile#version control

Explore more resources

Check out the full stdlib collection for more frameworks, templates, and guides to accelerate your technical leadership journey.