Back tostdlib
Blog Post

How to Use Claude Code Subagents to Parallelize Development

Claude Code sub-agents generate tickets and implement features in parallel, turning hours of planning into minutes and letting engineers stay focused on delivery.

The breakthrough is treating each specialist role as an independent AI sub-agent that works side-by-side instead of waiting for a single model to finish a long chain of tasks. A single command spins up a product-manager, a UX designer, and a senior software engineer, each receiving the same high-level goal but operating in its own context window. Within minutes they produce a complete Linear ticket with user stories, acceptance criteria, UI sketches, and a technical plan, eliminating the manual scoping loop that normally consumes hours.

The article shows the ticket generation in action: the product-manager drafts the "why" and "what," the UX designer proposes the flow and visual states, and the engineer outlines the backend implementation and risks. The three outputs merge into a single, ready-to-work ticket that can be handed off to implementation agents. Because the work happens in parallel, the overall latency equals the longest single sub-task, not the sum of all of them.

A concrete parallelization example is integrating Stripe payments. Instead of building the API route, the React form, the test suite, and the documentation sequentially, the orchestrator launches four agents-backend-specialist, frontend-specialist, QA-specialist, and docs-specialist. Each writes its artifact simultaneously, and the engineer receives a complete starter kit in the time it took the most complex piece to finish. This pattern scales to any multi-component feature, turning what used to be a day-long effort into a rapid sprint.

The approach also protects quality. By giving each agent its own large context window, no single model is forced to remember unrelated details, so the output stays focused and accurate. The trade-off is higher token usage and the inherent non-determinism of LLMs, which means engineers must monitor costs and be ready to rerun a sub-agent if its output is off. Nevertheless, the cost of failure is low, and the speed gains make it a practical tool for teams looking to eliminate bottlenecks in planning and execution.

Source: zachwills.net
#technical leadership#engineering management#AI#Claude#code generation#parallel development#software engineering#productivity

Problems this helps solve:

Team performanceProcess inefficienciesScaling

Explore more resources

Check out the full stdlib collection for more frameworks, templates, and guides to accelerate your technical leadership journey.