Unnecessary apologies for reasonable decisions erode a leader's authority and trust; the piece shows how to frame hard news with clear rationale instead of defaulting to sorry.
Leaders often reach for an apology when delivering unwelcome but reasonable business decisions, thinking it shows empathy. The real cost is a hidden power shift: the recipient perceives moral high ground and you signal uncertainty, which weakens authority over time.
The newsletter walks through a concrete scenario with contractors whose hours are being reduced. The apologetic version starts with "Unfortunately" and blames another team, then adds a personal sorry, leaving the contractor feeling wronged and indebted. The revised version simply states the business need, reminds the contractor of the agreed terms, and offers a straightforward path for questions, keeping the tone logical and respectful.
The contrast illustrates that the problem isn't the word "sorry" but the underlying framing. By presenting the rationale, you give the audience a clear context, preserve trust, and avoid creating a lingering sense of debt. This approach turns a potentially volatile interaction into a transparent update.
Before you default to an apology, ask whether you made a mistake or just lack a clear way to explain the decision. Share the why, align the message with the recipient's needs, and you'll maintain credibility while still being considerate.
Check out the full stdlib collection for more frameworks, templates, and guides to accelerate your technical leadership journey.