Change requires goodwill you must earn before spending. The architects who drive transformation save political capital slowly through consistent delivery and transparency, then spend it strategically on battles worth fighting.
Driving change in organizations requires political capital - an earned asset of goodwill that you deposit slowly and withdraw in big chunks. Most architects make the fatal mistake of arriving in a new organization, seeing opportunities for improvement, and pushing hard immediately. This approach burns through capital they haven't earned yet, often costing them their job before any lasting change takes hold. The organizations most desperate for transformation are usually the ones that have been successful doing things the same way for years, which means people have zero urgency to change anything.
You earn political capital through consistent actions that cost you little but build trust: delivering on promises, being transparent about your work, listening before jumping to solutions, giving credit freely, and owning your mistakes. The key insight is that political capital accumulates slowly but gets spent quickly. One outburst can erase months of goodwill. This means you need to choose your battles carefully. Starting small changes everywhere depletes your capital without lasting impact. Instead, save up to make one big move when it matters.
When you spend political capital, spend it on things that matter: bringing uncomfortable change, questioning the status quo, asking for leaps of faith, or optimizing for long-term gain at the cost of short-term pain. The article shares a concrete example where the author had the architecture team operate an in-house PaaS against established processes because the ops team would only update when all app owners agreed - a recipe for platform obsolescence. That big withdrawal required a full piggy bank.
The tricky part is you can never know exactly how much capital you have. The best test is making a small withdrawal - ask someone for a small favor. If you get "we'd love to help but have no time," your balance is near zero. The model isn't about becoming popular or playing corporate politics. It's about maximizing your effectiveness as a change agent by understanding that even positive change costs you, and you need the currency to pay for it.
Check out the full stdlib collection for more frameworks, templates, and guides to accelerate your technical leadership journey.