Back tostdlib
blog post

Individuals matter

An essay explaining why treating engineers as interchangeable heads leads to flawed roadmaps, hiring decisions, and attrition, and why recognizing individual contributions is essential for effective technical leadership.

Overview Individuals matter is an essay by Dan Luu that argues treating people as interchangeable resources leads to broken roadmaps, hiring, and retention decisions. It uses real-world examples from engineering organizations to illustrate how the non-fungibility of talent impacts project success and company health.

Key Takeaways

  • Treating engineers as fungible "heads" undermines effective planning and budgeting.
  • Roadmap accuracy depends on knowing who will execute tasks, not just abstract capacity.
  • Compensation and attrition policies that ignore individual value drive loss of top talent.
  • Managers need to consider individual strengths when forming teams and allocating work.
  • Organizational metrics should reflect impact of people, not just headcount.

Who Would Benefit

  • Engineering managers and directors designing roadmaps and staffing plans.
  • Technical leaders interested in talent allocation and retention strategies.
  • HR and compensation professionals working with engineering teams.
  • Executives seeking to align budgeting with real engineering productivity.
Source: danluu.com
#leadership#engineering management#people#team dynamics#budgeting#attrition#HR#resource allocation

Explore more resources

Check out the full stdlib collection for more frameworks, templates, and guides to accelerate your technical leadership journey.