If solving strategic problems is the more valuable thing to do, why aren't we doing it?
Overview\nThe article by Benn Stancil discusses why technical leaders often find themselves doing the "grunt work" of execution rather than focusing on high-level strategic problems. It examines the mismatch between the value of strategic thinking and the day-to-day tasks that engineers and managers are asked to perform, and offers guidance on how to shift responsibilities and influence within an organization.\n\nKey Takeaways\n- High-impact strategic work is frequently undervalued compared to tactical execution.\n- Leaders can create space for strategic thinking by delegating repetitive tasks and building strong teams.\n- Communicating the business value of strategic initiatives helps gain executive support.\n- Establishing clear roles and expectations reduces the likelihood of being pulled into grunt work.\n- Regular reflection on how time is spent can reveal opportunities to re-focus on higher-order problems.\n\nWho Would Benefit\n- Engineering managers who feel overwhelmed by operational duties.\n- Technical leads aiming to spend more time on architecture and product direction.\n- CTOs and VP of Engineering looking to improve organizational focus.\n- Senior engineers transitioning into leadership roles.\n\nFrameworks and Methodologies\n- Delegation matrix (RACI)\n- Strategic vs tactical work classification\n- Time-boxing and focus blocks\n- Lean management principles for eliminating waste\n
Check out the full stdlib collection for more frameworks, templates, and guides to accelerate your technical leadership journey.